The 2008 Republican presidential primary is looking squirrelier by the day. This month, we saw George Allen blow his chances at a presidential nomination; this Kathleen Parker piece is as good as any to get you up to speed on l'affair macaca.
Regardless of where the word came from in the senator's mind, it's both stupid and insensitive to make fun of the ethnicity of a Indian-American photographer from his Democratic challenger's camp. A prospective presidential candidate's going to be spending a lot of time in hotels for the next two years; the one group you don't want to tick off is Indians.
Allen doesn't seem ready for national prime time. It shouldn't cost him his senate seat, although it may make the race a notch closer than it should. This is Allen's equivalent of Howard Dean's post-Iowa howl; it isn't fair to have them defined by a particular faux pas, but life isn't fair.
So much for Allen as the Conservative Alternative. Who's on deck?
Conservative Catholic blogger the Anchoress is making a case for Rudy.
Difficult times demand of us difficult choices. From where I sit, it
doesn’t appear that endorsing someone who strictly adheres to orthodox
Catholicism will necessarily get the job done that needs doing, to
defeat the larger and more ominous forces that are threatening our
nation, Western Civilization and, yes, our faith. Can you show me the
conservative Christian/Catholic candidate who is electable
(yes, that matters) and who would take a strong enough stand in favor
of America, and in opposition to appeasement? The ideal does not exist.
Not yet, at least. However, McCain is more conservative on balance than Giuliani, despite Rudy's Mayor 9/11 reputation. Neither are perfect on social issues, but McCain is a notch more to the right on those issues. Neither are big economic conservatives. Both are hawkish on the War on Terror Radical Islam.
Both of them would be tolerable alternatives to any likely Democratic nominee, especially Sen. Clinton. However, both aren't well liked by the conservative base. We'll have a year to find an alternative that will reach the base; if an alternative isn't showing up on radar by Labor Day 2007, we'll likely be stuck with a Rudy/Romney/McCain race.
The two guys I like, Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee, are both on the pro-immigrant side of the immigration debate; that's not likely to sit well with the base. My fear is that Tom Tancredo could become that alternative; he could win a cluttered primary race, but would be problematic for the party for years to come.
Romney could be that alternative. As a governor, he's a bit of a empty suit on foreign policy and has been on both sides of a number of social issues. His support of MA's universal health insurance plan won't sit well.
In addition, Romney's Mormon roots might scare off some swing voters. I think he'll have more problems with that in the general elections with secular voters (who will be scared off of any devout faith) than with evangelicals who see Mormonism as a cult; some of them see Catholicism as all-but a cult, and they'll support conservative Catholics like Alan Keyes.
I don't see Romney being that conservative alternative. He might become the default choice of conservative who aren't ready for Rudy's cosmopolitanism or McCain's maverick centrist streak, but only a default choice if an electable alternative isn't available.
The problem is, I'm not seeing that electable alternative yet. Unlike the Anchoress, I think he does exist (yes, he, since Condi isn't it) but isn't showing up on radar in the polls.
Anyone want to be finance chairman on a Byron '08 campaign? :-)
As crazy as it sounds, I think if enough bloggers got behind a viable conservative candidate (seriously, I ain't it, folks; an overweight and underemployed college professor isn't getting elected), they might generate enough buzz to get him on national radar.
_____
Nevada as the second stop? The Democrats are looking to move the Nevada caucuses for the Saturday in-between the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, and move the South Carolina primary a week after NH. The premise is to bring more people of color into the mix, bringing the blacks in SC and the Hispanics (~20% of the population) in Nevada to bring some early diversity in an otherwise Anglo electorate in Iowa and NH.
NH doesn't like it; some of the candidates and media that would descend upon NH during those eight days after Iowa would wind up heading out to Nevada. Where would most folks, especially media folks, rather be in the middle of winter, Las Vegas or Manchester?
Since the Republicans aren't likely to move up their Nevada caucuses, you'll see a split screen from Wednesday to Saturday of Kickoff Week: Republicans taking about economics and national security in New Hampshire and Democrats playing up amnesty programs and sucking up to the gaming industry in Nevada.
Recent Comments