We're likely stuck with "Obamacare" until at least 2017, or at least 2015 if the Republicans can somehow conjure up a two-thirds majority in both houses in the 2014 election and override a presidential veto. Short of that, they're counting on the president blinking in a game of chicken if they try to hold something hostage while passing a repeal.
That being said, should Republicans make it work better in the meantime or fire BBs off the armor-plated Leviathan?
For America President Brent Bozell said that House Majority Leader
Eric Cantor, who supports the bill and pushing it behind the scenes
although he is not listed as a sponsor or a cosponsor, is to blame.
“Rather than sticking to his promise to repeal the massive government
takeover of healthcare that is Obamacare, which led to Republicans
taking the House majority in 2010, [Cantor] is actually advocating
shoring up a portion of the law that does nothing to use free
market-based reforms to cut healthcare costs,” Bozell said.
Asked about the comments, Cantor’s office pointed to support the
legislation has received, including a Wall Street Journal editorial and
from Freedom Works.
“The President’s health care law failed to adequately protect sick
patients with pre-existing conditions, like those battling cancer, but
House Republicans are determined to do so by taking funding from
Obamacare’s slush fund and moving it where it is critically needed,”
Cantor spokeswoman Megan Whittemore said.
The Club for Growth is also urging members to vote against the measure.
I can see where your usual suspects on the economic right are reflexively against it; they want it to crash and burn badly so that they can get it repealed sooner rather than later and lay the whole mess on the Democrats' lap.
However, the goal here isn't to "use free
market-based reforms to cut healthcare costs." It's to help folks who fall through the cracks of our insurance system. The status quo gives us some very efficient fatalities of folks who can't afford to pay for big-ticket care themselves, are too well off for Medicaid, too young for Medicare and are ignored by insurance companies who are willing to cover future problems but want to opt out of paying current ones.
"Let them eat Health Savings Accounts" doesn't do much here.
Recent Comments