6 So on that day Achish gave him Ziklag, and it has belonged to the kings of Judah ever since. 7 David lived in Philistine territory a year and four months.
8 Now David and his men went up and raided the Geshurites, the Girzites and the Amalekites. (From ancient times these peoples had lived in the land extending to Shur and Egypt.) 9 Whenever David attacked an area, he did not leave a man or woman alive, but took sheep and cattle, donkeys and camels, and clothes. Then he returned to Achish.
10 When Achish asked, “Where did you go raiding today?” David would say, “Against the Negev of Judah” or “Against the Negev of Jerahmeel” or “Against the Negev of the Kenites.” 11 He did not leave a man or woman alive to be brought to Gath, for he thought, “They might inform on us and say, ‘This is what David did.’” And such was his practice as long as he lived in Philistine territory. 12 Achish trusted David and said to himself, “He has become so obnoxious to his people, the Israelites, that he will be my servant for life.”
I'm struggling to see how the "man after's God's own heart" is majoring in murder, theft and habitual lying. He's raiding the non-Israeli territory southwest of the Philistines and saying he's raiding Hebrew tribes to the southeast of the Philistine king.
True, it gave Israel and strategic advantage to wipe out any corrupting influence to their SW and to keep the Philistines misinformed of the facts on the ground. It's ruthless and deceptive and seemingly effective.
However, it's application in the New Covenant era seems rather limited. We're supposed to make disciples of all nations these days, and it's hard to make disciples of dead people.
It's also hard to tell folks God's truth with the same mouth that you lie through your teeth with about your sources of income. I'm reminded of the Muslim custom allowing for lies to infidels to gain strategic advantage; Muhammad was from Arabia a notch south of Israel, so that tradition seemed to be well entrenched in that neighborhood a couple of millennia before the self-styled last prophet.
Is it OK to be ruthless and deceptive for a "good cause"? The New Testament leans towards a "no." The Old Testament had plenty of moments of parking-lotting of enemies and deceit by Israel, but the moral focus was on defending Israel at all costs and killing corrupting influences when called for. There was also an ethic of kindness to aliens in their midst if they weren't following false gods, but a ruthlessness otherwise.
The NT ethic includes Gentiles in God's kingdom, whereas the OT had Israel as an essentially closed loop with the very occasional outsider marrying in. We've created a worldwide "we" rather than a merely national "we." That's a counter-cultural stand, as it's now trendy to retreat to that smaller we that is national or even sub-national when the "we" includes just one's preferred demographic or ideological group.
That makes David's actions here bracing. It was from a different era than the one Jesus set up about 1990 years ago.
Recent Comments